Find the widest part in your diamond (it's the diamond's girdle),.In this situation, the carat weight mentioned in the table is incorrect, Otherwise, its length to width ratio is spoiled.
Check if your diamond has at least a Very Good cut (to know this, refer to its GIA certificate).Sometimes, the diamond size chart won't provide you with an accurate evaluation. Here's a terse instruction to get an insight into the diamond carat size from its appearance: What are the concrete steps to check its diamond carat size? I have a diamond and can measure its diameter. Or imagine how a diamond will look on your finger and how many carats you want it to be. For example, you can evaluate the carat size of any diamond by yourself. Knowing this table can come into practice in different situations. Thus, the only way to predict the carat number from a diamond diameter is to check the diamond carat size chart. But the diameter in millimeters changes by 0.3-0.9 mm without any consistency! A 2 carat diamond is NOT twice bigger than a 1 carat diamond In all the cases, the change in carat size is 0.5 carats. But the difference between a 2.5 carat and a 3-carat diamond is 0.3 millimeters surprisingly. If you compare a 2 carat and a 2.5-carat diamond, the divergence equals 0.8 millimeters. But this change is unpredictable.įor example, the difference between a 1 and a 1.5-carat diamond is 0.9 millimeters. Why is it so? The classic diamond size chart clarifies the relations between length, width, and carat size of a diamond.Īs you see in this table, the dependence between a diameter and a carat number of a diamond exists. A diamond size in millimeters and diamond carat size don't change proportionally.You should always check and prioritize diamond cut (not weight or size) to get a valuable stone,.Why are these two assumptions false? Because here's the truth: Thinking the bigger diamond always has a bigger carat size.Thinking the most important thing about a diamond is its carat weight,.There are 2 most common mistakes people make about diamonds:
0 kommentar(er)
